Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Nov 15, 2023. It is now read-only.

configuration: Consistency checks for PVF pre-checking #4580

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 28, 2021

Conversation

pepyakin
Copy link
Contributor

As was suggested by Alexander Popiak here, this commit
checks the consistency of the configuration.

@pepyakin
Copy link
Contributor Author

pepyakin commented Dec 22, 2021

Current dependencies on/for this PR:

This comment was auto-generated by Graphite.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the A0-please_review Pull request needs code review. label Dec 22, 2021
@pepyakin pepyakin added B7-runtimenoteworthy C1-low PR touches the given topic and has a low impact on builders. D5-nicetohaveaudit ⚠️ PR contains trivial changes to logic that should be properly reviewed. B0-silent Changes should not be mentioned in any release notes and removed B7-runtimenoteworthy labels Dec 22, 2021
@pepyakin pepyakin force-pushed the pep-unified-consistency-checks branch from 2a56742 to 425bf75 Compare December 22, 2021 15:21
@pepyakin pepyakin force-pushed the pep-unified-consistency-checks branch from 425bf75 to f0223e0 Compare December 24, 2021 14:43
Base automatically changed from pep-unified-consistency-checks to master December 27, 2021 14:09
As was suggested by Alexander Popiak [here][comment], this commit
checks the consistency of the configuration.

[comment]:
#4420 (comment)
@pepyakin pepyakin merged commit da88db6 into master Dec 28, 2021
@pepyakin pepyakin deleted the pep-pvf-consistency-checks branch December 28, 2021 13:53
drahnr pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 4, 2022
As was suggested by Alexander Popiak [here][comment], this commit
checks the consistency of the configuration.

[comment]:
#4420 (comment)
@jakoblell jakoblell added D1-audited 👍 PR contains changes to critical logic that has been properly reviewed and externally audited. and removed D5-nicetohaveaudit ⚠️ PR contains trivial changes to logic that should be properly reviewed. labels Jan 18, 2022
Wizdave97 pushed a commit to ComposableFi/polkadot that referenced this pull request Feb 3, 2022
As was suggested by Alexander Popiak [here][comment], this commit
checks the consistency of the configuration.

[comment]:
paritytech#4420 (comment)
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
A0-please_review Pull request needs code review. B0-silent Changes should not be mentioned in any release notes C1-low PR touches the given topic and has a low impact on builders. D1-audited 👍 PR contains changes to critical logic that has been properly reviewed and externally audited.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants